On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:58:03 +0900 Daisuke Nishimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:14:07 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:11:15 +0900 > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:52:26 +0900 > > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > mem+swap controller means a shrink to memory resource controller > > > > (try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages()) should drop only file caches. > > > > (Because kick-out-to-swap will never changes the usage.) > > > > > > > > right ? only global-lru can make a swap. > > > > maybe I can add optimization to do this. Hmm. I should see how OOM works > > > > under some situation. > > > > > I'm thinking mem+swap controller in a different way: an add-on to > mem controller, just as current swap controller. > I mean adding "memory.(mem+swap)_limit". > Hmm ? adding a control file other than - memory.limit_in_bytes ? Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
