H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Cedric Le Goater wrote: >>>> >>> I suggest "newinstance", but "newns" works, too. >> >> Could we also use this mount option to 'unshare' a new posix message >> queue namespace ? > > Sorry, I fail to see the connection with devpts here? Are you > suggesting using the same option for another filesystem (if so, which)?
yes. the posix message queues are also using a single superblock filesystem. If we want isolate them (for container needs for example), we also need to create a new sb. The patchset I have uses a clone flag but using a mount 'newns' really sounds like a better idea. C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
