[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hmm, so, single and multi-mount don't coexist ? i.e some are multi-mounts
> while others are single-mounts.
>
> The way I looked at is that even if a distro has not yet updated the
> startup script (fstab), we could use the multi-mount. Maybe a container
> startup script could change /dev/ptmx to symlink and both types of
> mounts can work simultaneously.
>
> Would that be unnecessary ?
>
Yes, that's unncessary; you can still use a "newinstance" elsewhere in
the system (in a container) where you rather by definition don't have a
backward compatibility issue.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
