On Thursday 2008-09-04 22:58, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:

>In conntrack_mt_v0() "ct->status" can be used even for untracked connection,
>is this right?

Yes.

>For example, does setting IPS_NAT_DONE_MASK and IPS_CONFIRMED_BIT on
>untracked conntracked really necessary?

Does it even happen? Something smells afoul if ct->status is anything
but zero/unset for the untracked entry.

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to