Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 06:58:38PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> static inline void
>>> -nf_conntrack_event_cache(enum ip_conntrack_events event,
>>> +nf_conntrack_event_cache(struct net *net, enum ip_conntrack_events event,
>>> const struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> {
>> Passing the conntrack instead of the struct net and the skb
>> would probably keep the callers cleaner.
>
> Dunno, passing netns explicitly like saying conntrack event happened in
> netns A, which is reasonable. OTOH, s/skb/ct/ is indeed nicer.
>
> I'll change it as you suggest and see what happens.
>
> BTW, I asked earlier if untracked conntracks are ever supposed to drop into
> event cache. If they're, trimming nf_conntrack_untracked is out of question.
No, they are skipped by the only event handler, ctnetlink.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
