* Oren Laadan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +     /* for checkpoint in process context (from within a container)
> +        the GS and FS registers should be saved from the hardware;
> +        otherwise they are already sabed on the thread structure */

please use the correct comment style consistently throughout your 
patches. The correct one is like this one:

> +     /*
> +      * for checkpoint in process context (from within a container),
> +      * the actual syscall is taking place at this very moment; so
> +      * we (optimistically) subtitute the future return value (0) of
> +      * this syscall into the orig_eax, so that upon restart it will
> +      * succeed (or it will endlessly retry checkpoint...)
> +      */

incorrect/inconsistent ones are like these:

> +             /* normally, no need to unlazy_fpu(), since TS_USEDFPU flag
> +              * have been cleared when task was conexted-switched out...
> +              * except if we are in process context, in which case we do */

> +             /* restore TLS by hand: why convert to struct user_desc if
> +              * sys_set_thread_entry() will convert it back ? */

> +                     /* FIX: add sanity checks (eg. that values makes
> +                      * sense, that we don't overwrite old values, etc */

(and there's many more examples throughout the series)

> +int cr_read_cpu_debug(struct cr_hdr_cpu *hh, struct task_struct *t)
> +{
> +     /* debug regs */
> +
> +     preempt_disable();
> +
> +     if (hh->uses_debug) {
> +             set_debugreg(hh->debugreg0, 0);
> +             set_debugreg(hh->debugreg1, 1);
> +             /* ignore 4, 5 */
> +             set_debugreg(hh->debugreg2, 2);
> +             set_debugreg(hh->debugreg3, 3);
> +             set_debugreg(hh->debugreg6, 6);
> +             set_debugreg(hh->debugreg7, 7);
> +     }
> +
> +     preempt_enable();
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}

hm, the preemption disabling seems pointless here. What does it protect 
against?

> +++ b/checkpoint/ckpt_arch.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +#include <linux/ckpt.h>
> +
> +int cr_write_thread(struct cr_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *t);
> +int cr_write_cpu(struct cr_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *t);
> +
> +int cr_read_thread(struct cr_ctx *ctx);
> +int cr_read_cpu(struct cr_ctx *ctx);

please add 'extern' to prototypes in include files.

> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>  #include <linux/ckpt.h>
>  #include <linux/ckpt_hdr.h>
>  
> +#include "ckpt_arch.h"
> +

plsdntuseannyngabbrvtsngnrcd. [1]

"checkpoint_" should be just fine in most cases.

        Ingo

[1] (please dont use annoying abbreviations in generic code)
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to