Quoting Dave Hansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I hate the syscall. It's a very un-Linux-y way of doing things. There,
Not really the syscall, but the writing to the file from the kernel. Any time I see set_fs(KERNEL_DS) i get flashbacks to getting yelled at in the 90s :) > I said it. Here's an alternative. It still uses the syscall to > initiate things, but it uses debugfs to transport the data instead. > This is just a concept demonstration. It doesn't actually work, and I > wouldn't be using debugfs in practice. It's neat how few lines this took, but I would prefer using a tiny custom fs rather than use debugfs for dump and configfs for restore. If you like I can take a shot at whipping up the new mini-fs, though I think you're having fun :) -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
