Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I could have sworn we had some function like | task_is_in_current_active_pid_ns(), but I looked and couldn't find it.
It was in one of the many signals patchsets we tried but none of them got accepted. We do have a variant out for review, ns_of_pid() that could be used, this patch task_pid_vnr() should be fine. | Maybe we should add one instead of open-coding this everywhere. If there are lot of users, we should define the wrapper for 'task_pid_vnr() > 0' but there is no other user at present (kill_something_info() checks for > 1). _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
