"Serge E. Hallyn" <se...@us.ibm.com> writes: > Quoting Gowrishankar M (gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com): >> From: Gowrishankar M <gomut...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> >> At present we scan all processes in init namespace, while getting or setting >> process priorities for a user. Incase of PID namespace, it leads to leak >> priority to processes in other namespace. >> >> Below patch proposes to use new macro controller to fix the boundary of >> processes list in current namespace. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar M <gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <se...@us.ibm.com>
Serge please look again. This has absolutely nothing to do with pids. This is a problem to be solved with the user namespace. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
