On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:20 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > If it would be possible, for example, for the 'init' namespace to have > no network interfaces at all, then it would be nicer to use a name > that's at least been used with nfs at *some* point--just on the general > principle of not leaking information to a domain that the user wouldn't > expect it to.
Then RPC would fail. Thanks to the limitations imposed by selinux & friends, all RPC sockets have to be owned by the init process. -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp trond.mykleb...@netapp.com www.netapp.com _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
