Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:11:28PM -0700, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Oren Laadan ([email protected]):
>>> +#if CONFIG_CHEKCPOINT
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> CONFIG_CHECKPOINT ?
>
Hmmm ... :(
Will fix, thanks.
Oren.
> Guenter
>
>>> +static int special_mapping_checkpoint(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx,
>>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>>> +{
>>> + char *name;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Currently, we only handle VDSO/vsyscall special handling.
>>> + * Even that, is very basic - we just skip the contents and
>>> + * hope for the best in terms of compatilibity upon restart.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> + if (vma->vm_flags & CKPT_VMA_NOT_SUPPORTED)
>>> + return -ENOSYS;
>>> +
>>> + name = arch_vma_name(vma);
>>> + if (!name || strcmp(vma_name, "[vdso]"))
>> Not important except for bisect-safety, as it's fixed in the next
>> patch, but this should be name, not vma_name.
>>
>> -serge
>> _______________________________________________
>> Containers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
