Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Dave Hansen ([email protected]): >> On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 10:42 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>> Quoting Dave Hansen ([email protected]): >>>> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 19:23 -0400, Oren Laadan wrote: >>>>> From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> Add "start" argument, to request to map vDSO to a specific place, >>>>> and fail the operation if not. >>>>> >>>>> This is useful for restart(2) to ensure that memory layout is restore >>>>> exactly as needed. >>>> This needs to go up at the start of the series. It can get merged >>>> before everything else. >>> It does, but now we are sending Oren mixed signals. >>> >>> I thought we were talking yesterday on irc about Oren doing append-only >>> git tree from now on, and someone else (you? :) was going to do patch >>> integration and sorting and prettifying? >> I was going to just go and start doing these, but I figured I'd have a >> run through the patches first. I probably also shouldn't be doing >> anything to which Oren (or anyone else) has really strong objections. >> So, I'll give everyone a chance to discuss and object before I go >> screwing the patches up. ;) > > True, part of this may be able to go up on its own. In that case > > 1. please put the part of my s390 fix patch which applies to > this patch in >
Fixed. > 2. as I asked when Alexey posted this, can we remove the > first argument to arch_setup_additional_pages()? Noone uses > it. I have no objections. Oren. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
