Quoting Oren Laadan ([email protected]): > > Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Matt Helsley ([email protected]): > > > > ... > > > >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c > >> index a7acfe6..f16be9d 100644 > >> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c > >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c > >> @@ -686,6 +686,7 @@ static const struct file_operations btrfs_ctl_fops = { > >> .unlocked_ioctl = btrfs_control_ioctl, > >> .compat_ioctl = btrfs_control_ioctl, > >> .owner = THIS_MODULE, > >> + .checkpoint = generic_file_checkpoint, > >> }; > > > > Do we really want this one? > > We need to checkpoint the open file regardless of whether the underlying > filesystem has snapshot capabilities.
But maybe we need to refuse a checkpoint if a task is talking to the underlying btrfs filesystem? -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
