OL> - if ((h->sock.type != SOCK_DGRAM) && (h->sock.type != SOCK_STREAM)) {
OL> - ckpt_debug("Socket type %i not supported", h->sock.type);
OL> + if (h->sock.type & ~SOCK_TYPE_MASK)
OL> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
OL> - }
The idea here was to prevent a rewritten checkpoint stream from
causing us to call sock_create() with a type that we don't support.
Checking the mask may be functionally equivalent right now, but may
open the door for an interesting failure later, no?
OL> static const struct proto_ops unix_seqpacket_ops = {
OL> @@ -565,6 +569,8 @@ static const struct proto_ops unix_seqpacket_ops = {
OL> .recvmsg = unix_dgram_recvmsg,
OL> .mmap = sock_no_mmap,
OL> .sendpage = sock_no_sendpage,
OL> + .checkpoint = sock_unix_checkpoint,
OL> + .restore = sock_unix_restore,
OL> };
Have you tested SEQPACKET? I haven't.
Other than that, it looks fine to me and fails the same set of tests
that the current tree does.
--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
