On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:36:22AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
> ...
> 
> > +
> > +static void elv_preempt_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct io_queue 
> > *ioq)
> > +{
> > +   elv_log_ioq(q->elevator->efqd, ioq, "preempt");
> > +   elv_slice_expired(q);
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * Put the new queue at the front of the of the current list,
> > +    * so we know that it will be selected next.
> > +    */
> > +
> > +   requeue_ioq(ioq);
> > +   ioq->slice_start = ioq->slice_end = 0;
> 
> I think this assignment is redundant because these two members will be reset
> when this ioq is scheduled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>

thanks Gui. Queued for next posting.

Vivek

> ---
>  block/elevator-fq.c |    1 -
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c
> index d04e925..b3c387d 100644
> --- a/block/elevator-fq.c
> +++ b/block/elevator-fq.c
> @@ -2650,7 +2650,6 @@ static void elv_preempt_queue(struct request_queue *q, 
> struct io_queue *ioq)
>                */
>  
>               requeue_ioq(ioq);
> -             ioq->slice_start = ioq->slice_end = 0;
>               elv_mark_ioq_slice_new(ioq);
>       }
>  }
> -- 
> 1.5.4.rc3
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to