OL> IMHO this is over-engineered. This way, you place net-related OL> knowledge in ckpt_ctx_free(), instead of isolating that sort of OL> smarts under net/ subdir. I'd rather see the clean-up logic near OL> the "litter" logic, so to speak.
Well, I still need to clean up the list after the deferqueue has run, so something has to go into ckpt_ctx_free() to do that. I can make it a specific call like ckpt_sock_cleanup_listening() or something, but that will still need to go in checkpoint.h so I can call it from ctx_free()... -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
