On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote: > In some cases I wish we had a server vs desktop switch, since it would > decisions on this easier. I know you say that servers care about > latency, but not at all to the extent that desktops do. Most desktop > users would gladly give away the top of the performance for latency, > that's not true of most server users. Depends on what the server does, > of course.
If most of the I/O on a system exhibits seeky tendencies, couldn't the schedulers notice that and use that as the hint for what to optimize? I mean, there's no switch better than the actual I/O behavior itself. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
