On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Daisuke Nishimura
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> @@ -56,6 +61,7 @@ static int really_do_swap_account __initdata = 1; /* for
>> remember boot option*/
>>
>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_tasklist); /* can be hold under cgroup_mutex */
> This mutex has already removed in current mmotm.
> Please write a patch for memcg based on mmot.
Ok.
>
>> #define SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_THRESH (1000)
>> +#define THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_THRESH (100)
>>
>> /*
>> * Statistics for memory cgroup.
>
> (snip)
>
>> @@ -1363,6 +1395,11 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct
>> *mm,
>> if (mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check(mem))
>> mem_cgroup_update_tree(mem, page);
>> done:
>> + if (mem_cgroup_threshold_check(mem)) {
>> + mem_cgroup_threshold(mem, false);
>> + if (do_swap_account)
>> + mem_cgroup_threshold(mem, true);
>> + }
>> return 0;
>> nomem:
>> css_put(&mem->css);
>> @@ -1906,6 +1943,11 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page *page, enum
>> charge_type ctype)
>>
>> if (mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check(mem))
>> mem_cgroup_update_tree(mem, page);
>> + if (mem_cgroup_threshold_check(mem)) {
>> + mem_cgroup_threshold(mem, false);
>> + if (do_swap_account)
>> + mem_cgroup_threshold(mem, true);
>> + }
>> /* at swapout, this memcg will be accessed to record to swap */
>> if (ctype != MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT)
>> css_put(&mem->css);
> Can "if (do_swap_account)" check be moved into mem_cgroup_threshold ?
Ok, I'll move it. It will affect performance of
mem_cgroup_invalidate_thresholds(),
but I don't think that it's important.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
