Make the flow more regular.  With the existing code, one can barely
find the call to checkpoint_task_obj_ns() even if looking for it!

This is on top of the task->fs c/r patch I sent last week.

Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <[email protected]>
---
 checkpoint/process.c |   17 ++++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/checkpoint/process.c b/checkpoint/process.c
index 603bbf4..bef909a 100644
--- a/checkpoint/process.c
+++ b/checkpoint/process.c
@@ -247,12 +247,17 @@ static int checkpoint_task_objs(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx, 
struct task_struct *t)
 
        ret = checkpoint_task_creds(ctx, t);
        ckpt_debug("cred: objref %d\n", ret);
-       if (!ret) {
-               ret = checkpoint_task_ns(ctx, t);
-               ckpt_debug("ns: objref %d\n", ret);
+       if (ret < 0) {
+               ckpt_err(ctx, ret, "%(T)process credentials\n");
+               return ret;
        }
-       if (ret < 0)
+
+       ret = checkpoint_task_ns(ctx, t);
+       ckpt_debug("ns: objref %d\n", ret);
+       if (ret < 0) {
+               ckpt_err(ctx, ret, "%(T)process namespaces\n");
                return ret;
+       }
 
        fs_objref = checkpoint_get_task_fs(ctx, t);
        if (fs_objref < 0) {
@@ -291,8 +296,10 @@ static int checkpoint_task_objs(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx, 
struct task_struct *t)
        signal_objref = ckpt_obj_lookup_add(ctx, t->signal,
                                            CKPT_OBJ_SIGNAL, &first);
        ckpt_debug("signal: objref %d\n", signal_objref);
-       if (signal_objref < 0)
+       if (signal_objref < 0) {
+               ckpt_err(ctx, signal_objref, "%(T)process signals\n");
                return signal_objref;
+       }
 
        h = ckpt_hdr_get_type(ctx, sizeof(*h), CKPT_HDR_TASK_OBJS);
        if (!h)
-- 
1.6.0.4

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to