>> In fact there is no error in the script :) >> The -n option for lxc-ps is a ps option ! > > heh, good catch - given -n is pretty ubiquitous in lxc > commands it should probably be used here :) > > And a '--' should be allowed to separate lxc-ps options from > /bin/ps ones.
lxc-ps is just an enhanced ps and, ultimately, lxc-ps should disappear and be replaced by a new ps option, like the -z on solaris. this is similar to the -Z for listing the security context of a file the with ls I agree with suka that -n shouldn't be used as a short option for --name. because the result is confusing. C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
