On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 09:38:00AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Louis Rilling ([email protected]):
> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 04:39:55PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > Support checkpoint and restart of tasks in nested pid namespaces. At
<snip>
> > It would probably be safer too to use task_active_pid_ns() instead of
> > task->nsproxy->pid_ns, just in case some PID namespace unsharing like
> > proposed
> > by Eric makes it to mainline.
>
> The task is frozen though so it shouldn't be able to unshare while being
> checkpointed, right? But it's probably better code anyway.
By the time it reaches checkpoint a frozen task is in the refrigerator
-- most often in the signal delivery portion of syscall return. So it can't
be making any new unshare/setns syscalls and any changes to the namespaces
should be visible.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
