On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:31:17PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 09:40:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday 01 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
> > > From: Matt Helsley <matth...@us.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > Update stale comments regarding locking order and add a little more detail
> > > so it's easier to follow the locking between the cgroup freezer and the
> > > power management freezer code.
> >
> > I guess these three patches are for me.
> >
> > Do you want me to handle them?
> >
> > Rafael
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> I think you can take 15 as it's an update to the comments.
>
> 16 and 17 are specific to checkpoint/restart. There are no other in-kernel
> uses, that we've identified, for them. So I was under the impression that it's
> inappropriate to add them without also adding the checkpoint/restart patches
> that use them.
Of course, assuming I'm wrong about the dependency on checkpoint/restart, I
have no objection to your taking them.
Thanks again!
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
