On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:08, Dhaval Giani <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > We really shouldn't be asking userspace to create new root filesystems. >>> > So follow along with all of the other in-kernel filesystems, and provide >>> > a mount point in sysfs. >>> > >>> > For cgroupfs, this should be in /sys/fs/cgroup/ This change provides >>> > that mount point when the cgroup filesystem is registered in the kernel. >>> >>> But cgroups will typically have multiple mounts, with different >>> resource controllers/options on each mount. That doesn't really fit in >>> with this scheme. >> >> Really? I see systems mounting it at /cgroups/ in the filesystem today. >> Where are you expecting it to be mounted at? >> > > Not really. It is getting mounted at /cgroups/<name of resource > controller>/ at a number of places. Keeping it in sysfs loses us a lot > of this flexibility. Unless you are ready to keep adding a new > mountpoint for each subsystem, it will not really work out in the long > term.
As mentioned earlier in this thread, systemd already mounts a tmpfs at the cgroup mountpoint. We need only a single directory. This should not be an issue. Kay _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
