On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:00:15 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:39:44 -0700 > Greg Thelen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If the current process is in a non-root memcg, then > > global_dirty_limits() will consider the memcg dirty limit. > > This allows different cgroups to have distinct dirty limits > > which trigger direct and background writeback at different > > levels. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> > Why FREEPAGES in memcg is not counted as dirtyable ? Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
