jamal <[email protected]> writes: > Eric, > > Ping? > If you are too busy to push these in maybe have > someone clueful like Daniel help out submitting? I think it > should probably be reasonable to leave out the sockeat > patch initially if it is deemed controversial..
This merge cycle I am too busy, and my patches did not make it into linux-next before the merge window. Everything except socketat at seems non-controversial. socketat makes sense to post-pone a little bit until we start converting applications, and there is a little real world experience about what is needed. I anticipate some time freeing up in the next couple of weeks so I should be ready for the next merge window. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
