On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 03:24:16 +0000 "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Quoting Andrew Morton ([email protected]): > > On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:04:07 +0000 > > "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There's a fairly well adhered to convention that global symbols (and > > often static symbols) have a prefix which identifies the subsystem to > > which they belong. This patchset rather scorns that convention. > > > > Most of these identifiers are pretty obviously from the capability > > subsystem, but still... > > Would 'inode_owner_or_capable' be better and and make sense? > I suppose so. We've totally screwed that pooch in the VFS (grep EXPORT fs/inode.c). But it's never to late to start. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
