On Mon 18-06-12 14:28:00, Glauber Costa wrote:
> From: Suleiman Souhlal <[email protected]>
> 
> mem_cgroup_do_charge() was written before slab accounting, and expects
> three cases: being called for 1 page, being called for a stock of 32 pages,
> or being called for a hugepage.  If we call for 2 or 3 pages (and several
> slabs used in process creation are such, at least with the debug options I
> had), it assumed it's being called for stock and just retried without 
> reclaiming.
> 
> Fix that by passing down a minsize argument in addition to the csize.
> 
> And what to do about that (csize == PAGE_SIZE && ret) retry?  If it's
> needed at all (and presumably is since it's there, perhaps to handle
> races), then it should be extended to more than PAGE_SIZE, yet how far?
> And should there be a retry count limit, of what?  For now retry up to
> COSTLY_ORDER (as page_alloc.c does), stay safe with a cond_resched(),
> and make sure not to do it if __GFP_NORETRY.
> 
> [v4: fixed nr pages calculation pointed out by Christoph Lameter ]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <[email protected]>

I think this is not ready to be merged yet.
Two comments below.

[...]
> @@ -2210,18 +2211,18 @@ static int mem_cgroup_do_charge(struct mem_cgroup 
> *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>       } else
>               mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res, res);
>       /*
> -      * nr_pages can be either a huge page (HPAGE_PMD_NR), a batch
> -      * of regular pages (CHARGE_BATCH), or a single regular page (1).
> -      *
>        * Never reclaim on behalf of optional batching, retry with a
>        * single page instead.
>        */
> -     if (nr_pages == CHARGE_BATCH)
> +     if (nr_pages > min_pages)
>               return CHARGE_RETRY;
>  
>       if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT))
>               return CHARGE_WOULDBLOCK;
>  
> +     if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> +             return CHARGE_NOMEM;

This is kmem specific and should be preparated out in case this should
be merged before the rest.
Btw. I assume that oom==false when called from kmem...

> +
>       ret = mem_cgroup_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, flags);
>       if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= nr_pages)
>               return CHARGE_RETRY;
> @@ -2234,8 +2235,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_do_charge(struct mem_cgroup 
> *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>        * unlikely to succeed so close to the limit, and we fall back
>        * to regular pages anyway in case of failure.
>        */
> -     if (nr_pages == 1 && ret)
> +     if (nr_pages <= (1 << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) && ret) {
> +             cond_resched();
>               return CHARGE_RETRY;
> +     }

What prevents us from looping for unbounded amount of time here?
Maybe you need to consider the number of reclaimed pages here.

>  
>       /*
>        * At task move, charge accounts can be doubly counted. So, it's
> @@ -2369,7 +2372,8 @@ again:
>                       nr_oom_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
>               }
>  
> -             ret = mem_cgroup_do_charge(memcg, gfp_mask, batch, oom_check);
> +             ret = mem_cgroup_do_charge(memcg, gfp_mask, batch, nr_pages,
> +                 oom_check);
>               switch (ret) {
>               case CHARGE_OK:
>                       break;
> -- 
> 1.7.10.2
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]";> [email protected] </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9    
Czech Republic

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to