On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Maxim V. Patlasov <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm for accounting NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP because balance_dirty_pages is already > overcomplicated (imho) and adding new clauses for FUSE makes me sick.
Agreed. But instead of further complexifying balance_dirty_pages() fuse specific throttling can be done in fuse_page_mkwrite(), I think. And at that point NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP really becomes irrelevant to the dirty balancing logic. Thanks, Miklos _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
