Hi Scott, On 10/02/16 16:47, Scott Dowdle wrote: > I think the best thing you could do would be to pass along the complaints... > as they really should not be directed toward the CentOS Project in the first > place.
Thats what we typically do - encourage folks to engage with the upstream / service providers / sources of content. > It would be interesting to hear what the complaints were. Generally > speaking, some folks seem to complain that they are too big (too many > packages pre-installed) for their tastes. Other than that, I haven't heard > too much. > > The basic way they are assembled is by installing a set of packages into a > chroot and then making some minor changes (like an apache config change that > has 1 server started rather than 5), and then just compressing that either as > a .tar.gz (OpenVZ Legacy) or as a compressed disk image (Virtuozzo 7). > > I do appreciate you reaching out and encourage you to continue to do so in > the future with any other OpenVZ related matters. Most of the complaints stem around compromised instances, or bad yum repo definitions or non managed / non manageable content being included in the instance content etc. So it would be good to start with a solid instance (template ?) and try to promote that. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
