On 30.07.2020 17:00, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
On 7/30/20 4:58 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
Exceeding cache above cache.limit_in_bytes schedules high_work_func()
which tries to reclaim 32 pages. If cache generated fast enough or it allows
cgroup to steadily grow above cache.limit_in_bytes because we don't reclaim
enough. Try to reclaim exceeded amount of cache instead.
https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-106384
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabi...@virtuozzo.com>
---
Changes since v1: add bug link to changelog
mm/memcontrol.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 3cf200f506c3..e5adb0e81cbb 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3080,12 +3080,16 @@ static void reclaim_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
{
do {
+ unsigned long cache_overused;
+
if (page_counter_read(&memcg->memory) > memcg->high)
try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages, gfp_mask,
0);
- if (page_counter_read(&memcg->cache) > memcg->cache.limit)
- try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages, gfp_mask,
- MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP);
+ cache_overused = page_counter_read(&memcg->cache) -
+ memcg->cache.limit;
+ if (cache_overused)
+ try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, cache_overused,
+ gfp_mask, MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP);
} while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)));
}
can we run some testing and after that create custom RK to make check with
HostEurope on Monday?
1. Which kernel version(s)?
2. Would it be enough to prepare the live patch as .ko file and load it
manually ('kpatch load') or RPM package is preferable?
If you plan to use the fix on more than one node, I think, an RPM
package is easier to use. For a single node, *.ko file would be enough.
.
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
