From: Andrey Ryabinin <[email protected]>

We use mostly 64-bit systems this days. Since they don't have higmem
it's better to not segregate GFP_HIGHMEM and !GFP_HIGHMEM latencies.
For backward compatibility we still output alochigh/alochighmp fields
in /proc/vz/latency but show only zeroes.

https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-81395
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <[email protected]>

https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-127780
(cherry-picked from commit 1fcbaf6d1fb218104b0e0f0b7958a384fdb4c075)

Signed-off-by: Pavel Tikhomirov <[email protected]>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 0200cc8c43cf8..4f99e43cbfc94 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4527,16 +4527,11 @@ static void __alloc_collect_stats(gfp_t gfp_mask, 
unsigned int order,
        time = jiffies_to_usecs(jiffies - time) * 1000;
        if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_RECLAIM))
                ind = KSTAT_ALLOCSTAT_ATOMIC;
-       else if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGHMEM))
+       else
                if (order > 0)
                        ind = KSTAT_ALLOCSTAT_LOW_MP;
                else
                        ind = KSTAT_ALLOCSTAT_LOW;
-       else
-               if (order > 0)
-                       ind = KSTAT_ALLOCSTAT_HIGH_MP;
-               else
-                       ind = KSTAT_ALLOCSTAT_HIGH;
 
        local_irq_save(flags);
        cpu = smp_processor_id();
-- 
2.30.2

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to