Hi Dan, On 03/27/2014 10:32 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > I prefer keeping vdsm-devel intact. It's a different programming > language, with its different set of problems, unrelated profiling > issues, and somewhat different target audience.
Having vdsm-devel on fedorahosted is a long-standing cause for confusion. I'd love to see the list moved to ovirt.org. Personally I see no problem with a separate vdsm-devel list, as long as everyone is also subscribed to devel - the point of devel is to concentrate project-wide technical discussion and put an end to the propagation of CCs we see in oVirt. If vdsm-devel is for VDSM-specific issues, but anything which could impact anyone else in the project can be discussed *only* on devel, then a separate list would probably be OK. However, if we start seeing "To: devel; CC: vdsm-devel" then we're just perpetuating a problem (that we don't know where to talk to each other about development topics). Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary - Community Action and Impact Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 / Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13 _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
