On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:33:13AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Il 21/05/2014 11:08, Sven Kieske ha scritto: > > Hi, > > > > and thanks for the list with the open bugs. > > > > Here are my proposed blockers (I won't add > > them directly without dev agreement) > > The list is not ordered in any way: > > > > Cache records in memory > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870330 > > Status: Post > > > > ovirt-log-collector: conflicts with file from package sos >= 3.0 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037663 > > Status: Post > > I'm working with sos maintainer for coordinating oVirt 3.4.2 release with sos > 3.1.1 release fixing the issue > by moving all oVirt sos plugins to upstream sos fixing conflicts once for all. > Since a workaround exists (yum downgrade sos to 2.2-31.fc19 still available > in F19) I don't think it should be a blocker. > > > > > > Firmware missing > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063001 > > Status: Post > > > > Hot plug CPU - allow over-commit > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097195 > > Status: New > > > > Stucked tuned service during host deploying > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069119 > > Status: New > > > > Failed to reconfigure libvirt for VDSM > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078309 > > Status: NEW > > Let's discuss this on sync meeting, not sure it's important enough for > blocking the release. > > > > > [vdsm] Fix make distcheck target > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098179 > > Status: NEW
and this most certainly should not block a micro release. it is a code-only change, with no functional effects. > > > > Run vm with odd number of cores drop libvirt error > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070890 > > Status: New _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
