On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:42:05PM +0300, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 09/25/2014 04:06 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > >I don't belive Vdsm is soon to be used by anything outside oVirt. But if > >software purists win, oVirt would publish only tarballs. > >Fedora/Debian/whatever would build, package, and deploy them all, and > >the ovirt repo would become redundant. > > > >I did not expect to hear much support for keeping Vdsm in Fedora. Given > >what I've heard, how about taking the in-between road? > > > >- Keep Vdsm in Fedora, abiding to Fedora rules. > >- Hope that Engine and qemu-kvm-rhev join, too. > > we did the work to add engine, but it was useless without its gui, and was > impossible to add gwt to fedora. > qemu-kvm-rhev is not needed in fedora as fedora has a full blown qemu-kvm > with all features enabled. > you only need qemu-kvm-rhev on .el6 hosts.
I meant that qemu-kvm-rhev is missing from Fedora's EPEL6/7 branches. As such, Vdsm cannot require it in its own EPEL build. > > >- Until they do, build vdsm.rpm with non-Fedora quirks (such as the > > qemu-kvm-rhev requirement) > > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
