----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <[email protected]> > To: "Nir Soffer" <[email protected]> > Cc: "infra" <[email protected]>, "devel" <[email protected]>, "Ido Barkan" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 12:32:03 PM > Subject: Re: [VDSM] ipwrapperTests.TestDrvinfo failing on f21 slave, pass on > f20 slave > > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 05:28:14PM -0400, Nir Soffer wrote: > > Hi infra, > > > > These tests fail on Fedora 21 slave, and pass on Fedora 20 slave. > > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_unit-tests_created/1888/console - > > FAIL > > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_unit-tests_created/1908/console - > > PASS > > > > Infra: please check the Fedora 21 slave, maybe this is configuration issue? > > Ido: please check if the tests are valid > > > > Generally these tests are not unitests, and should not run for validating > > unrelated patches. They should move to the functional tests. > > Could you explain your assertions? > > This tests do not require a functioning vdsm. They don't test vdsm's > API, so they should not end up in the "functional" directory. > > The ipwrapperTests tests the ipwrapper unit of vdsm. But in order to do > so, they interact with the host system, and attempt to create a bridge. > When this setup fails for some reason (I do not know why `brctl > addbr vdsmtest-O8JmI` failed) the test ends up in an ERROR state. > > If we fail to fix this condition ASAP, we catch this failure and skip > the test as broken. But I don't think we should thrown it out of the > test suite altogether.
This requires functioning brctl, so this is integration test. This is true for many other tests that should move to the missing integration tests suite. Nir _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
