On 7 Sep 2015, at 15:35, Tal Nisan wrote: > Why did we choose 300 and 600? I think it's way too much, I'd go for emailing > after 30 days and for abandoning after 60 days.
it's coming…;-) this is just a first huge cleanup of really ridiculously outdated stuff > It's reversible anyway, abandoned patches can always be restored by the > author. > > On 09/05/2015 01:18 PM, Allon Mureinik wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> Gerrit is our front yard, and we'd like to keep it clean, tidy, and >> welcoming to newcommers. >> >> We have a jenkins job waiting to act as a roomba just waiting to be switched >> on (thanks Eyal!). >> It will send out an email about patches being stale for over 300 days and >> will force abandon patches stale over 600 old. >> >> What we need you to do: >> Go over your patches and make sure you haven't missed anything. If you have >> a path that old that for some obscure reason still has merit, just comment >> on it that it's still relevant to bump its last modification date (or better >> yet - answer the review, rebase it, and push for it to get merged). >> >> To search for such patches, you can use the "status:open age:300d" search >> string in gerrit. >> So, e.g, for your own patches, you could use "status:open age:300d >> owner:self", or as a quick link: >> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+age:300d+owner:self >> >> >> Thanks, >> Your friendly neighbourhood cleanup patrol >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list >> Devel@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
