On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Nir Soffer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Martin Sivak <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 1. master >>> >>> vdsm-4.19.0-201606011345.gitxxxyyy >> >> Ack and +1 to the idea, but I have one small comment. Isn't it usual >> in Fedora (for example) to use the following? >> >> vdsm-4.19.0-0.201606011345.gitxxxyyy >> >> Please note the zero in the release part (-0.something). The stable is >> then released as vdsm-4.19.0-1 keeping the version intact. > > Thanks for correcting me Martin, I omitted the release number mistake. > >> >> Martin >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Nir Soffer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We are going to branch 4.0 today, and it is a good time to update our >>> versioning scheme. >>> >>> I suggest to use the standard ovirt versioning, use by most projects: >>> >>> 1. master >>> >>> vdsm-4.19.0-201606011345.gitxxxyyy >>> >>> 2. 4.0 >>> >>> vdsm-4.18.1 >>> >>> The important invariant is that any build from master is considered newer >>> compare with the stable builds, since master always contain all stable >>> code, and new code. >>> >>> Second invariant, the most recent build from master is always newer compared >>> with any other master build - the timestamp enforces this. >>> >>> Thoughts?
Dan? _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
