On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > is a graph that shows gwt-rpc performing slightly better than de-rpc. >> Memory consumption is about the same -- gwt-rpc is just a faster rpc >> implementation. >> > > I'm wondering if we have any data about de-rpc vs. gwt-rpc under WAN > conditions. With latency (say, 70ms, based on [1]) and possibly some packet > loss (0.5% should suffice). > Y. > > [1] http://www.internettrafficreport.com/30day.htm > > We did WAN testing for the memory leaks, but not for the rpc change. (The ask got misinterpreted by me -- my bad.) I'll get you some results for this this week. Greg
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
