On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Nir Soffer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Piotr Kliczewski > <[email protected]> wrote: >> One more failure [1] > > I posted this: > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/73074 > > Hopefully we can understand this failure better when we reproduce this with > the > data that fail the checksum.
Partial success, we have now a failing test: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/7618/console It fail because we don't have a checksum on storage: expected='9\x19\x00\x00', actual='\x00\x00\x00\x00' So now we need to understand why the checksum bytes were not written to storage in this test, but was in storage the other 999 tests. > > Nir > >> >> [1] >> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/7610/console >> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Piotr Kliczewski >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Nir, >>> >>> I saw this issue in [1]: >>> >>> 10:20:12 FAIL: test_send_receive (storage_mailbox_test.TestMailbox) >>> 10:20:12 >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> 10:20:12 Traceback (most recent call last): >>> 10:20:12 File >>> "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-fc25-x86_64/vdsm/tests/storage_mailbox_test.py", >>> line 132, in test_send_receive >>> 10:20:12 self.assertFalse(expired, 'message was not processed on time') >>> 10:20:12 AssertionError: message was not processed on time >>> >>> it is something known? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Piotr >>> >>> [1] >>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-patch-fc25-x86_64/1541/console _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
