On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <dan...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Daniel Belenky <dbele...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> The following test is failing: 002_bootstrap.verify_add_hosts >> All logs from failing job >> Only 2 engine patches participated in the test, so the suspected patches >> are: >> >> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/82542/2 >> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/82545/3 >> >> Due to the fact that when this error first introduced we had another >> error, the CI can't automatically detect the specific patch. >> >> Error snippet from logs: ovirt-host-deploy-ansible log (Full log) >> >> TASK [ovirt-host-deploy-firewalld : Enable firewalld rules] >> ******************** >> failed: [lago-basic-suite-master-host-0] (item={u'service': u'glusterfs'}) >> => {"changed": false, "failed": true, "item": {"service": "glusterfs"}, >> "msg": "ERROR: Exception caught: org.fedoraproject.FirewallD1.Exception: >> INVALID_SERVICE: 'glusterfs' not among existing services Permanent and >> Non-Permanent(immediate) operation, Services are defined by port/tcp >> relationship and named as they are in /etc/services (on most systems)"} >> >> >> Error from HOST 0 firewalld log: >> lago-basic-suite-master-host-0/_var_log/firewalld/ (Full log) >> >> 2017-10-15 16:51:24 ERROR: INVALID_SERVICE: 'glusterfs' not among existing >> services > > > Ondra, would such an error propagate through the playbook to Engine and fail > the add-host flow? (I think it should!) > > Do you know which package provide the glusterfs firewalld service, and why > it is missing from the host? >
I see that /usr/lib/firewalld/services/glusterfs.xml is shipped by glusterfs-server.rpm, but it provides a server named "glusterfs-static". In any case, a virt-only cluster should not be installing glusterfs-server.rpm nor requiring any glusterfs firewall service. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
