On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Barak Korren <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 16 November 2017 at 10:30, Martin Sivak <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I wonder where did this category division come from, some of these, > >> like "VDSM" or "Infra" or "SLA" may not be easy for users to > >> understand. > >> We need to be careful about using internal development terms in user > >> facing documentation. > > > > And yet we require the user to select a team using the same terms when > > filing a new bug.. > > > > I agree with you, but I think the mandatory field in bugzilla is > > another candidate for consideration. > > I've no disagreement with this statement, then again, I don't know > much about the complex reasons behind the selection of fields used in > bugzilla. > > > Nothing complex, to be honest. The bugzilla "oVirt team" fields come to reflect the different teams owning a bug. Those are valuable for the teams, but some also make sense for users (virt/storage/infra/network/dwh/node), while others might be a bit more confusing (ux/integration/SLA). Not sure what VDSM is with regards to the feature pages? maybe for old features? I assume we can merge it into one of the others. And we can send some explanation upstream (or better add one to the website) if that helps. > > -- > Barak Korren > RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi > Red Hat EMEA > redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
