On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:36 PM Viktor Mihajlovski < mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I have issues updating vdsm on my Fedora 27 host (s390x, although I > would think that the arch shouldn't matter). > > [mihajlov@s3560022 ~]$ sudo dnf update > ... > > ================================================================================ > Package Arch Version Repository > Size > > ================================================================================ > Upgrading: > ovirt-release-master > noarch 4.2.1-0.0.master.20180108005748.git96e5658.fc27 > > ovirt-master-snapshot 11 k > vdsm s390x 4.20.11-18.git92c490ca8.fc27 > ovirt-master-snapshot 79 k > ... > (14/15): vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.20.11-18.git92c490 29 kB/s | 16 kB > 00:00 > (15/15): vdsm-python-4.20.11-18.git92c490ca8.fc 363 kB/s | 1.2 MB > 00:03 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Total 454 kB/s | 1.9 MB > 00:04 > Running transaction check > Transaction check succeeded. > Running transaction test > The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful > transaction. > You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. > Error: Transaction check error: > file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/__init__.pyc conflicts > between attempted installs of > vdsm-network-4.20.11-18.git92c490ca8.fc27.s390x and > vdsm-common-4.20.11-18.git92c490ca8.fc27.noarch > file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/__init__.pyo conflicts > between attempted installs of > vdsm-network-4.20.11-18.git92c490ca8.fc27.s390x and > vdsm-common-4.20.11-18.git92c490ca8.fc27.noarch > > I *think* this is caused by packaging __init__.py* with both > vdsm-network and vdsm-common. The patch > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/86062/ should help to get around that. > I think you are right. It will not be possible to install vdsm-network without the __init__.py file without vdsm, but we don't have such use case yet. > BTW: The vdsm-network package was transiently built as noarch before it > was replaced by an arch-specific RPM. Since the noarch version has > vanished from the repositories in the meantime, that part of the patch > may be obsolete. > I think we can ignore this package, it was never released, and it was never correct anyway. Nir > > -- > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards > Viktor Mihajlovski > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
