Il giorno mer 20 mar 2019 alle ore 11:55 Dan Kenigsberg <[email protected]>
ha scritto:

>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:44 PM Sandro Bonazzola <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Il giorno mer 20 mar 2019 alle ore 11:07 Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <
>> [email protected]> ha scritto:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:43 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:51 PM Anton Marchukov <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Retrigger failed, seems to be the same error [1]?
>>> >
>>> > OK, taking a look now.
>>>
>>> I noticed that it is installing a very old openvswitch version in
>>> fedora - 2.8.1 - as you can check in the logs [0].
>>>
>>> 17:21:51   openvswitch.x86_64 2.8.1-2.fc28
>>> 17:21:51   openvswitch-ovn-central.x86_64 2.8.1-2.fc28
>>> 17:21:51   openvswitch-ovn-common.x86_64 2.8.1-2.fc28
>>> 17:21:51   openvswitch-ovn-host.x86_64 2.8.1-2.fc28
>>>
>>> The 'check-patch' scripts have also begun failing for all my patches
>>> on all targets *except* 4.2 - check [1].
>>>
>>> On el7, it is grabbing version openvswitch.x86_64
>>> 1:2.9.0-4.el7 from centos-ovirt-4.2-el7.
>>>
>>> ovirt-provider-ovn *requires* openvswitch 2.10 on 4.3 *and* master.
>>>
>>> Sandro, this is just a theory, but to me it looks like
>>> ovirt-provider-ovn master doesn't "know" it needs to get the packages
>>> from the virt7-ovirt-43-testing tag or something alike.
>>>
>>
>> I would start with adding
>> Requires: openvswitch >= 2.10
>> to ovirt-provider-ovn spec file.
>>
>
> We don't want to force installation of provider and OvS on the same
> host/container. But we can add a Conflicts < 2.10 line.
>

I think you're kind of abusing the meaning of Conflicts to workaround a RPM
limitation regarding containerization but I won't stop you from doing that.
I tend to think this won't pass a fedora review session.


>
>
>> Then yes, looks like OST is taking openvswitch from the wrong repo.
>> Dafna, can you fix OST repo config for taking openvswitch from
>> https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/virt/$basearch/ovirt-4.3/ on EL7
>> and
>>
>> https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mdbarroso/openvswitch/fedora-$releasever-$basearch/
>> for Fedora?
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I've tried locally to revert patch [2] that added the 4.3 branch to
>>> the provider; it fixed this, but I think that's just masking the
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> [0] -
>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-provider-ovn_standard-on-merge/264/consoleFull
>>> [1] -
>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-provider-ovn_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/611/
>>> [2] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/98565/
>>>
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > [1]
>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-provider-ovn_standard-on-merge/264/
>>> > >
>>> > > > On 19 Mar 2019, at 17:10, Anton Marchukov <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I retriggered. Will see.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> On 19 Mar 2019, at 16:25, Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>>
>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-provider-ovn_standard-on-merge/263/
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > Anton Marchukov
>>> > > > Associate Manager - RHV DevOps - Red Hat
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Anton Marchukov
>>> > > Associate Manager - RHV DevOps - Red Hat
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
>>
>> MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
>>
>> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>
>> [email protected]
>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>
>

-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV

Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>

[email protected]
<https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/AFILGICFUXBWLTR63FROXL6I76VGK674/

Reply via email to