On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:48 PM Milan Zamazal <[email protected]> wrote:

> Amit Bawer <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:14 PM Nir Soffer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:06 PM Amit Bawer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per
> patch I
> >>>>>>>>>> am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on
> first try,
> >>>>>>>>>> then on second one).
> >>>>>>>>>> Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that
> >>>>>>>>>> when I push 30+ patches at the same
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and
> is
> >>>>>>>>> it also bad for reviewers,
> >>>>>>>>> getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every
> >>>>>>>>> rebase.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push
> >>>>>>>> (without working on 30 different branches) ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I don't know about such way.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins plugins
> >>>>>> [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to
> prevent
> >>>>>> jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to decide if
> ci
> >>>> should run or not?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI in
> some
> >>> cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right [3].
> >>> [3] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is too much work, but I think today we can add a comment to gerrit
> >> like
> >>
> >>     ci please test
> >>
> >> That will trigger a build of this patch.
> >>
> >
> > Indeed, but it leaves the "Continuous-Integration" mark untouched in
> > gerrit, giving the wrong impression this patch is still CI failed.
>
> No, it updates CI score.  I use it routinely with falsely failed tests.
>
> In my experience, CI score may not get updated if there are concurrent
> builds, such as when you upload a new version of a patch while CI is
> still running on the previous version.
>

I may have missed something, but i tried "ci build" gerrit comment on one
of the CI failed patches https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/101357/
the CI build passed, but CI indicator is still -1. AFAICT I had no other CI
jobs running at the time.


>
> > The re-trigger UI takes care for that as well.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit
> >>>>>> plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for
> example
> >>>>>> skipping by a topic regex [2].
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Not clear how this will help.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" I can
> >>> control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches.
> >>> When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature" and
> have
> >>> CI per push as usual.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in a
> >>>> changeset, same way we have in travis,
> >>>> and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists work.
> >>>> Every post to gerrit will trigger one
> >>>> build, instead of one build per patch in the chain.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> That could do as well.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed by a
> >>>> later patch in the chain, which
> >>>> is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted resources.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the verification
> >>> process.
> >>>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +Anton Marchukov <[email protected]>  I have been told you might be
> >>>>> familiar with a similar solution.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip
> >>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-trigger-to-ignore-my-ci-users-commits
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for
> >>>>>>> reviews on one topic
> >>>>>>> you can work on the other branches.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between
> >>>>>>>>>>> AWS and PHX which is still being investigated.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve
> >>>>>>>>>>> debugging from amazon side?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> repository.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Example can be seen here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console
> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> List Archives:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWEMD2JQ6WARHJRDTYCPI/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Eyal edri
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> He / Him / His
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> MANAGER
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> SYSTEM ENGINEERING
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
> >>>>>>>>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018
> >>>>>>>>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> >>>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> >>>>>>>>>> List Archives:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUVGUFUNHF2ZALB5I4JPZ/
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> > oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> > List Archives:
> >
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/MMXGDBHHLMFGXYB4SJM74WTCI3J2UBRQ/
>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZUT3AJSGY5L67KGZ5G2JRVIFJHMG6K37/

Reply via email to