On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 8:32 AM Nir Soffer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:24 PM Neal Gompa <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > As far as the oVirt software keeping up with Fedora, the main problem here 
> > has always been that people aren't integrating their software into the 
> > distribution itself. That's how everything can get tested together. And 
> > this comes back to the old bug about fixing vdsm so that it doesn't use 
> > /rhev, but instead something FHS-compliant (RHBZ#1369102). Once that is 
> > resolved, pretty much the entire stack can go into Fedora. And then you 
> > benefit from the Fedora community being able to use, test, and contribute 
> > to the oVirt project. As it stands, why would anyone do this for you when 
> > you don't even run on the cutting edge platform that feeds into Red Hat 
> > Enterprise Linux?
>
> This was actually fixed a long time ago. With this commit:
> https://github.com/oVirt/vdsm/commit/67ba9c4bc860840d6e103fe604b16f494f60a09d
>
> You can configure a compatible vdsm that does not use /rhev.
>
> Of course it is not backward compatible, for this we need much more
> work to support live migration
> between old and new vdsm using different data-center configurations.
>

It'd probably be simpler to just *change* it to an FHS-compatible path
going forward with EL8 and Fedora and set up a migration path there,
but it's a bit late for that... :(


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/SBAZ2F3FCOVGHRL7UNYTBLRX63BSBTCC/

Reply via email to