-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 14.05.2014 21:20, Lukas Reschke wrote: > > On 14 May 2014, at 21:14, Mark Ziegler <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Short statement :-/ > > Would have preferred a long wikipedia article that just confused > people?
A to the point reason is highly appreciated, because a) you shall not follow someone blindly b) we love to gain more knowledge >> Could you please give some more details. AFAIK bigger key length >> is better cause it takes longer to crack it. > > In short: That does not matter. Sure, your vendor tells you that > they use that new super awesome AES-256 stuff which is military > grade technology and even unbreakable by the NSA in 2?000 years. > But that?s mainly just marketing bullshit. > > Thomas Pornin has written some quite good statements about this: > http://security.stackexchange.com/a/19762/18365 > http://security.stackexchange.com/a/6149/18365 Thank you. Cheers Arthur -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTdJ39AAoJEHQk8YdIVN8jcFQP/jPifTFMDiH8t/5sVaQHZ0r/ tyM07dadMy5UhEGKBcD/q098lhl8lAE9LJb4LkA8/3QglL9+uQVH1YkwTeLq9jx/ wLsbhCJIHU34yT//uUxKxESFShlcmtgom3FBsZWSVPg9FIuktuPrrszv4wCNWS21 fuclOm2IwSplC9ke7e+KTt6a01bGeaJb0o1jGdzWp1Fjfz2ekoqouAe4L2pQXfU9 KbHCyeiibocg6OlcKOO9/gAAv5f2fJ1T3WJ8MhI2vuouZXgg9tJ4m8lFKziJ5p+m mAAC983yIoCnf14w0KHltDSRgSiaimif/6wJ2C4HTMv3sqY0mZierBDaLOo9XZAK FUre9+bgcQ67EKqUsWotGYSeDwaI2t2asLkOVE93eEKEjwizsf4f+M9AKUi1DtrS uIc7gxkrqmhaPy4r33RIKYLcGoagXwtsCbdisjmQZyr3q0piAeJ+Ca2jkxMsquEk iYjfttTCUllgFSfcvQ8Hb9TfHgNN5RlNvTJckT98ZT8pjMDbeMfDTGSoBh//PAyI a8VytihQyBMaOAY2u5zYDsoa3PvbpKIsRvpTHvaAKwFXqwak9E/im2YbC/yeNux0 4MPUOmkz2DD/bRwfdkc/Z4qfTaQ7XK7/5Bn/O/Mdpefh0mY+eHsEMmRhNhbSaXry u5UWynjxv1ecBGtybQU9 =PBrk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.owncloud.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
