On 22.12.2015 10:02, Chris wrote: > Hi, > >> I don't think this is a big problem. An "official release" _is_ the > availability of a tarball > > i think it will be a problem if the "final testing" as written above shows > errors. Yes, in this case the tarname would have to have a new name. Yes, we struggled with that in the past, but that were mistakes.
> The main problem with the arch packages are that they purely rely on github > tags. It happened in the past that github tags are moved forwards and > backwards during the release timeframe so it might happen that Arch is > releasing a different version. > Wow, I would consider that a problem as well. And I think that wont happen any more. regards, Klaas _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.owncloud.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
