Hi,
looks like it's gonna be February 5th and 6th (a Thursday and a Friday).
Martin is the only one that is not available on Thursday. Is everyone okay
with that?

Cheers,
Martine

2015-01-19 17:30 GMT+01:00 Hauke Petersen <hauke.peter...@fu-berlin.de>:

>  Hi everyone,
>
> sandwiching the H&A is indeed not a good idea, I agree.
>
> Thanks Martine for the doodle, let's wait until Thursday and decide on the
> dates based on the outcome of the doodle then.
>
> Cheers,
> Hauke
>
>
>
> On 19.01.2015 13:17, Martine Lenders wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Since this thread has gained some traction now I would propose to use to
> dudle it out. The two days adjacent to each other where most are available
> would be the date: https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/RIOT-NSFT1/
>
> Cheers,
> Martine
> Am 19.01.2015 12:29 schrieb "Emmanuel Baccelli" <
> emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr>:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>> damn, your right, I misread the dates. So Hack'nAck would be "sandwiched"
>> inside the workshop, and I guess that's not great. How about 28-29, or
>> 29-30, then?
>> Best
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Thomas Eichinger <
>> thomas.eichin...@fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I’d also like to attend. I’d prefer a date without H&A in-between (as
>>> these tend to
>>> end late at night, which would make it hard to start with NSTF early
>>> again) but
>>> wouldn’t object if there is a majority in favour of this.
>>>
>>> Best, Thomas
>>>
>>> > On 16 Jan 2015, at 19:08, Hauke Petersen <hauke.peter...@fu-berlin.de>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Dear RIOTers,
>>> >
>>> > we recently came up with the idea to create task forces around special
>>> topics in RIOT to concentrate and speed up the development of key parts.
>>> The idea is to bring all people that are interested in this topic and are
>>> prepared to spend some on it together in a (virtual) room and start out by
>>> a 2-3 day workshop style event. This first period should be used to discuss
>>> the topic in detail to bring everyone involved on the same page, to come up
>>> with a clear architecture, and define interfaces and sub-modules. The hope
>>> is, that we can go into a very productive implementing phase afterward and
>>> speed up the overall development.
>>> >
>>> > The first key topic we want to try out this concept is the ongoing
>>> re-structuring of the network stack. I propose the following plan for this:
>>> > - we use next week to coordinate (who wants to join, what is the
>>> current state, what are the most pressing open questions)
>>> > - we block 2 days in the last week of January for a (virtual)
>>> white-board centered workshop
>>> >
>>> > For the workshop I propose January 27-28, but its just a proposal...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regarding technical aspects that are currently under (heavy)
>>> construction or need to be clarified (@Martine: please hit me if I have it
>>> completely wrong here...):
>>> > - optimizations to the netdev interface
>>> > - optimizations to the netapi interface
>>> > - analysis of possible data loss using netapi in its current state
>>> > - how to pass data/headers/packets around the stack
>>> > - possible generalization and/or quotas in the packet buffer
>>> > - concepts of global protocol/module list and global protocol handler
>>> registry
>>> > - API definition for the neighbor table
>>> > - API definition for the forwarding table
>>> > - possible join for neighbor and forwarding table
>>> > - hooks for various routing protocols
>>> > - ???
>>> >
>>> > This is just a initial list of topics to be further discussed - I hope
>>> we can detail it out over the next week to have a good idea about the
>>> questions that need time for discussion!
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > So concluding:
>>> > - who is interested (and/or) wiling to joing this effort?
>>> > - are there any ideas on the concrete organization of such a
>>> task-force?
>>> > - are there technical aspects I forgot?
>>> >
>>> > Looking forward to your feedback!
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Hauke
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > devel mailing list
>>> > devel@riot-os.org
>>> > http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel@riot-os.org
>>> http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@riot-os.org
>> http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing 
> listdevel@riot-os.orghttp://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to