On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Ken Bannister <kb...@runbox.com> wrote:
> Oleg, > > >>> There's definitely a need for generic MAC layer solutions in RIOT, >> besides the >> specific solutions like CSMA in the cc110x driver or TiSCH for 802.15.4e >> as >> part of the OpenWSN stack. As far as I know, at least two people are >> currently >> working on MAC layer implementations for RIOT. I will also take a look >> into >> this topic with the goal to use only the MAC layer part of the OpenWSN >> stack >> as a standalone module in RIOt. >> > I think your idea to cut its stack at the MAC layer is a good fit for both > projects. > Use OpenWSN for its efficient and reliable 15.4e and 6TiSCH MAC/adaptation > layers, > and RiOT for its higher level layers and libraries. +1 Emmanuel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
