The way I envision it is as a starting point for RIOT, a base. Once the project is integrated, then we can make changes to it as we see fit. Is that an accurate picture or is it more a case of utilizing the project and handling changes to that project that affect RIOT as they occur on Wakaama independently through patches? Perhaps some combination of those?
> On Mar 23, 2015, at 4:33 PM, Hauke Petersen <hauke.peter...@fu-berlin.de> > wrote: > > Hi David, > > when using Wakaama (which is certainly an option), the way would be to > include it in RIOT as a package and include some Makefiles that are able to > download/checkout the library and build it into RIOT. When choosing this > path, one important thing is to think of a concept for continuous > integration, so that the Makefiles and patches can be adjusted to changes of > the Wakaama implementation in an easy way. > > Cheers, > Hauke > > >> On 23.03.2015 19:45, David Reinert wrote: >> I am almost certainly planning on using the Wakaama project(formerly >> liblwM2M) for this project. A possibly silly question but, would a final >> port of this implementation look similar to the various ports under >> RIOT/pkg/ or is it more involved than that? I am just trying to get a >> picture of what the final project would look like so I can better form a >> clear timeline. Thanks! >> >> -David >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> devel@riot-os.org >> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@riot-os.org > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
